ESCRS - Accelerated corneal crosslinking works ;
ESCRS - Accelerated corneal crosslinking works ;

Accelerated corneal crosslinking works

An accelerated corneal crosslinking (CXL) approach appears to be safe for treating patients with progressive keratoconus

Accelerated corneal crosslinking works
Howard Larkin
Howard Larkin
Published: Monday, May 8, 2017
[caption id="attachment_8322" align="alignnone" width="557"]Thomas Kohnen MD, PhD Thomas Kohnen MD, PhD[/caption] An accelerated corneal crosslinking (CXL) approach appears to be safe for treating patients with progressive keratoconus, and delivers comparable visual and corneal biomechanical results to the standard Dresden protocol while reducing treatment time 60 minutes to 18 minutes, Thomas Kohnen MD, PhD, told the 2017 ASCRS•ASOA Symposium & Congress in Los Angeles, USA. In a retrospective study of 12 patients with progressive keratoconus Dr Kohnen and colleagues conducted at Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany, accelerated CXL increased corneal densitometry as measured by Scheimpflug imaging three months after surgery, particularly in the anterior stromal layer within the central concentric zones of 0.0mm to 2.0mm, and 2.0mm to 6.0mm. Mean spherical equivalent, maximum keratometry and simulated keratometry were not significantly changed, while mean central corneal thickness decreased significantly from 470.08 ±32.02 microns before treatment to 453.08 ±35.44 microns afterward. In a second retrospective study comparing 29 Dresden Protocol and 29 accelerated CXL patients, all keratoconus indices improved in both groups, with progression stagnating in the accelerated group and regressing slightly in the Dresden group. Increased corneal density was evident on imaging up to 12 months after treatment. These studies suggest accelerated CXL is safe and effective for treating progressive keratoconus using 18mW/cm2 for five minutes, greatly reducing treatment time, Dr Kohnen said. However, more study and development are needed. “There is a small advantage for the Dresden protocol compared to the accelerated protocol but further studies are required for direct comparison.”
Latest Articles
Glaucoma Treatment Under Pressure

New techniques and technologies add to surgeons’ difficult decisions

Read more...

Outside the Box, Inside the Pipeline

Researchers are tackling glaucoma diagnosis and treatment from all sides.

Read more...

The EHDS Is Ready for the Green Light

If proposal is approved, Europe could see better access to, and exchange and use of, health data.

Read more...

ESCRS to Release Guidelines for Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Comprehensive approach to the safest and most effective modern surgery.

Read more...

Barry Fellowship Opens Up ‘Whole New Field of Thought’

The 2022 recipient combines theoretical and practical to learn new treatments.

Read more...

Digitalising the OR—Experience and Perspectives

Benefits include saving time and improving outcomes.

Read more...

ESCRS Heritage Programme

Visionaries past and present.

Read more...

Dynamic Measures Needed for Quality of Vision

Functional visual acuity testing and straylight metering may better reflect real-world conditions.

Read more...

What Is Stopping Digital OR Adoption?

Ophthalmologists know the benefits—now it’s time to construct the right plan.

Read more...

Time to Move Beyond Monofocal IOLs?

European surgeons appear hesitant to first offer other presbyopia-correcting options to patients.

Read more...

;